Legal Opinion
C&H Nationwide, Inc. v. Norwest Bank Texas NA
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 8, 2000No. Nos. 99-10121, 99-10381PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Chief Judge: '
Plaintiff-Appellant C&H' Nationwide,’ Inc., appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing C&H’s garnishment action against Appellees Wesley Kennemer. and Curley Joe Trucking, Inc. (No. 99-10121), and the district court’s subsequent award of attorney’s fees to Appellees (No. 99-10381). We dismiss appeal 99-10121 as moot, reverse the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to Appellees, and deny all motions carried with the case.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff-Appellant C&H Nationwide, Inc. (“C&H”), and Appellees Wesley Ken-nemer and Curley Joe…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fleming Foods of Texas, Inc. v. RylanderTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Virginia Woodfield, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Third Party v. Charlie Bowman, Planet Insurance Co., Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- C & H Nationwide, Inc v. Norwest Bank Texas Na, Garnishee Wesley Kennemer Curley Joe Trucking C & H Nationwide Inc v. Norwest Bank Texas Na Wesley Kennemer Curley Joe Trucking, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000