Legal Opinion

Hanrahan v. Mayor of Baltimore City

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1911PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Elliott, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.

This action was broug’ht by the appellant, Catherine Hanrahan, as owner of the house and lot ETo. 116 'W. Lafayette avenue, Baltimore, to recover for damages to said house caused by the construction of a sewer by the appellee, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, acting in conjunction with the appellees, M. A.-Talbott and Company, general contractors for said work under a written contract between them and the Mayor and City Council.

The declaration contains five counts.

The first count merely alleges that the defendants so located, dug and constructed a sewer in Rutler alley adjoining the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Bonaparte v. WisemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Mallette Ex Rel. Thomas v. British American Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Shafer v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Plitt v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Moore v. American Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. EagersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  4. Tinney v. CrosbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  5. Westfarm Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API