Legal Opinion
Ryder v. State
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1982No. 13545PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASLEY, Chief Justice.
Ryder, Cano and Pressing were indicted for distribution of marijuana. The trial court suppressed the evidence obtained from the search warrant. On interlocutory appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the lower court and held that the suppressed evidence was admissible. We granted the petition for certiorari, and we affirm the Court of Appeals but on different grounds than those enunciated by that court.
We discuss:
1. Whether a state court has jurisdiction to hear a case involving a criminal offense committed on a highway within an Indian reservation by non-Indians,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. McBratneySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Boone v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. SchmuckWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Romero v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.