Legal Opinion
Constant v. Pacific Nat'l Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 3, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
84 N.J. Super. 211 (1964)
201 A.2d 405
CHRIS CONSTANT, A MINOR, LOUIS CONSTANT, A MINOR, BOTH BY ANDREW CONSTANT, AS THEIR GUARDIAN AD LITEM, HELEN CONSTANT, REGINA ARKOVITIS AND JACK ARKOVITIS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
PACIFIC NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided June 3, 1964.
Mr. James H. McLeod argued the cause for plaintiff.
Mr. Vincent D. Enright, Jr. argued the cause for defendant (Messrs. Harth & Enright, attorneys).
YANCEY, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
The plaintiffs in this action, Chris Constant, a minor, Louis Constant, a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hughes v. FetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- City of Hackensack v. WinnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Atlantic City v. American Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- Krohn v. GardnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Walker v. ChoudharyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.