State v. Ledbetter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLEY, Justice.
**192 In this case we consider whether the absence of a procedural rule limits the Court of Appeals' discretionary authority to issue a writ of certiorari. In denying defendant's petition for writ of certiorari, the Court of Appeals held that although it had jurisdiction to issue the writ, it lacked a procedural mechanism under Rule 21 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure to do so without further exercising its discretion to invoke Rule 2 to suspend the Rules. See State v. Ledbetter , --- N.C. App. ----, ----, 794 S.E.2d 551 , 555 (2016) (per curiam); see also…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Womble v. Moncure Mill & Gin Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. StubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. KnollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- In re R.A.F., R.G.F.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
- State v. BranhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- State v. KilletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. KilletteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.