Legal Opinion

State v. Ledbetter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 8, 2018No. 402PA15-2PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Justice.

**192 In this case we consider whether the absence of a procedural rule limits the Court of Appeals' discretionary authority to issue a writ of certiorari. In denying defendant's petition for writ of certiorari, the Court of Appeals held that although it had jurisdiction to issue the writ, it lacked a procedural mechanism under Rule 21 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure to do so without further exercising its discretion to invoke Rule 2 to suspend the Rules. See State v. Ledbetter , --- N.C. App. ----, ----, 794 S.E.2d 551 , 555 (2016) (per curiam); see also…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Womble v. Moncure Mill & Gin Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. StubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  5. State v. KnollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. In re R.A.F., R.G.F.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
  3. State v. BranhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  4. State v. KilletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  5. State v. KilletteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API