Legal Opinion

Dilatush v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1960No. 180-59PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

Plaintiff was removed from his civilian position with the Department of the Air Force. He contends that said removal action was unlawful and resulted from action of his superiors which was arbitrary, capricious, illegal, malicious, fraudulent and without cause. He sues for back pay based upon the above removal action.

This case arises on defendant’s motion to dismiss for the reason that the petition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Defendant contends (1) that plaintiff’s claim is barred by collateral estoppel because the same issue as presented here was considered and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edgar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  2. Frank v. Dilatush v. Charles E. Wilson, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Ray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baskett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  2. Batchelor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. MullinsUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API