Legal Opinion
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Local 174
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1999No. 97-35859PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
170 F.3d 897
160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2769, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,386,
1999-1 Trade Cases P 72,480,
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1879,
1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2429
BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY; Santa Fe
Railway Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174, an
unincorporated association; Robert A. Hasegawa,
an individual; Eric Smith, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 97-35859.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 4, 1998.
Decided March 16, 1999.
1
Dimitri Iglitzin, Schwerin Campbell Barnard LLP, Seattle, Washington, for the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 174Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 174Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Local 174Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company Santa Fe Railway Company v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 174, an Unincorporated Association Robert A. Hasegawa, an Individual Eric SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999