Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Investigation, In The Matter Of Multiple Representation By Christopher Kiernan, Esq. Matthew Molus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 17, 1999No. 99-15125PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
182 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 1999)
IN RE: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION, IN THE MATTER OF MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION BY CHRISTOPHER KIERNAN, ESQ.
MATTHEW MOLUS; JASON MOLUS; MARK MOLUS; MICHAEL RICHARD MOLUS, III; DWAYNE ELLISON; STEVE GIORDANO; H.D. WEEKS; JOHN DRAKE; GORDON SIMPSON, APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE.
No. 99-15125
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Argued and Submitted May 10, 1999
Decided June 17, 1999
Christopher D. Kiernan, La Quinta, California, for the appellants.
Frank P. Cihlar, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the appellee.
Appeal from the United…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Darnell HayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Cole v. United States District Court for the District of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Grand Jury Process, John Doe v.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Darnell HayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.