People v. Scott

I concur in the result and in the writing of Judge Hancock in Scott and Judge Titone in Keta. In both cases, I agree that, under the State Constitution, defendants’ reasonable expectation of privacy — not some new privacy right, but the privacy right encompassed within the guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures, as that guarantee is uniformly defined* — has been transgressed. *503Moreover, I am satisfied that the grounds recited in both writings for the Court’s conclusions are fully in accord with the law and our own precedents.

I write separately only to respond to the broader…