Legal Opinion

Milchman v. Rivera

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided May 10, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur Wachtel, J.

These are six dispossess proceedings for nonpayment of rent in respect to which there was a joint trial by consent of landlord and the tenants. In all these cases it was conceded that the relationship of landlord and tenant existed, that the rent was due, that it was the legal rent, that demand had been made, and that the rent was not paid. It was also conceded that the tenants in all these cases were welfare recipients.

The defense in each of these cases was based upon section 143-b of the Social Welfare Law of the State of New York. This act provides (L. 1962, ch. 997):

§ 2. The social…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. GottliebCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987
  2. Pantalis v. ArcherNew York District Court · 1976
  3. Crystal Apartments Group v. HubbardCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
  4. Fidler v. KurtisNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In re AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API