Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Meyers

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 7, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The motion of the proponent for a bill of particulars is granted to the following extent, and the contestant will be required to furnish a verified bill containing the following items:(1) The place or places where and the time or times when the acts alleged to constitute undue influence or fraud took place.(2) In general terms the acts, course of conduct, false statements, suppressions of facts and misrepresentations alleged to have been used (a) in the fraud, or (b) in the practice of undue influence upon the decedent.

These particulars will be required to be stated separately as to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921
  2. Zecchini v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Smidt v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of LippmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of VeederNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  2. In re the Estate of Van RiperNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. In re the Estate of NachmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  4. In re the Estate of TribbleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of DexterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API