Legal Opinion

Hasty v. Grimes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1957No. 36737Published

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

The sole question for this court to determine is whether or not the trial court erred in denying the rule absolute and discharging Sheriff Grimes. Counsel for the plaintiff call our attention to Code §§ 24-206 and 9-606. Code § 24-206 reads as follows: “If any sheriff, coroner, justice of the peace, constable, clerk of the superior court, or attorney at law shall fail, upon application, to pay to the proper person or his attorney any money he may have in his hands, which he may have collected by virtue of his office, the party entitled thereto or his attorney *149may serve said officer with a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Langston & WoodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Nicholson v. Wilborn & McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. John Bean Manufacturing Co. v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. McLaughlin v. BlountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  5. Betts v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API