McCandless v. Freedman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a temporary order of child support entered against the defendant, Phillip Freedman. Appellee-plaintiff seeks to quash the appeal as interlocutory, claiming that the trial court has not yet held a de novo hearing in the matter. Mr. Freedman argues that, pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1910.11(f) and (i), the trial court was to have held its hearing within sixty (60) days after one was requested. According to Freedman, the court’s failure to act within 60 days renders the interim order final.
The parties to this appeal have spent the past seven years litigating the questions of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Freedman v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Meier v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Sanders v. SandersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Grove North America, Division of Kidde Industries, Inc. v. Arrow Lift & Construction Equipment Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McIntyre Square Associates v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003