Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 18, 1997No. 97-0847-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

Joseph Perry appeals a judgment convicting him after a bench trial of four counts of uttering a forged writing, in violation of § 943.38(2), Stats. Perry claims there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the charges because the forged items he uttered were not writings "whereby legal rights or obligations are created, terminated or transferred" as required under § 943.38(l)(a). We disagree and affirm his convictions. He also claims the trial court erred in permitting the State to amend the information to add two additional counts of forgery that were not transactionally related to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Minuteman, Inc. v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. SchmalingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. State v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. State v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RyythSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SchulpiusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  3. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2011
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  5. State v. Morales-PedrosaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API