Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Town of Islip
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 2011PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant County of Suffolk established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not have prior written notice of a defect on a sidewalk that allegedly caused the plaintiff to fall (see Suffolk County Charter § C8-2A; Regan v Town of N. Hempstead, 66 AD3d 863, 864 [2009]; Koehler v Incorporated Vil. of Lindenhurst, 42 AD3d 438 [2007]; Lysohir v County of Suffolk, 10 AD3d 638, 639 [2004]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Regan v Town of N. Hempstead, 66 AD3d at 864;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Koehler v. Incorporated Village of LindenhurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Lysohir v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Regan v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martens v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dutka v. OdiernoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Estate of Peretz v. Village of Great Neck PlazaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Estate of Peretz v. Village of Great Neck PlazaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Gebhardt v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.