Legal Opinion

State v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 17, 2011No. 20090344-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MeHUGH, Associate Presiding Judge:

1 1 Robert Ferguson appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual abuse of a child, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404.1 (2008), arguing that evidence of his prior instances of child sexual abuse should not have been admitted under rule 404(b) of the Utah Rules of Evidence. Although we conclude that the evidence was erroneously admitted, we affirm Ferguson's conviction because there is no reasonable likelihood that the error affected the outcome of the proceedings.

BACKGROUND

T2 Ferguson was employed at a seulpting studio as a groundskeeper. In February 2008,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. DecorsoUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. SaundersUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. WarehamUtah Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LuceroUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. HighCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. State v. FredrickCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. State v. MarchetCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API