Legal Opinion

Pulaski Iron Co. v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 17, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Argued at Wytheville. Decided at Wytheville. Appeal from decree of circuit court of Wythe county, rendered at September term, 1890, in a suit wherein the appellant, the Pulaski Iron Company, was complainant, and George W. Palmer and wife were defendants, the object of the suit being to correct a mistake in the deed from the latter, conveying to the complainant certain mineral interests. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.

*385The suit was brought by-the appellant company, the Pulaski Iron Company, to correct a mistake in the deed of the appellees, George "W. Palmer and wife, conveying to them certain mineral interests in the lands of the said appellees. The plaintiff’s bill sets forth that its'agent, George T. Mills, one of the directors of the said appellant company, made a contract to purchase- with the said Palmer and wife, by which, for the Pulaski Iron Company, he purchased of the said Palmer and wife all their mineral interests in the tract of land in question here, the said Palmer and wife, reserving, by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mauzy v. SellarsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1875
  2. Leas' Ex'or v. EidsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
  3. Carter v. McArtorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tuck v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  2. City of Norfolk v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Hale v. HaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  5. Melott v. WestWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API