Legal Opinion

Winsor v. Savage

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1845Published

Assumpsit by the assignee -ff Henry Curtis, a bankrupt, to recover the balance of an account alleged to be due from the defendant. The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHubbard, J.

This action was referred to an auditor to examine the accounts of the parties, and it now comes before the court, upon his report, to settle certain questions, previously to a final statement of the accounts between Henry Curtis, of whom the plaintiff is assignee, under the United States bankrupt law, and Savage, the defendant. These persons were, for many years, owners in common of sundry vessels, and were also often jointly interested in their cargoes. In the management of their mutual concerns, Curtis took charge of the vessels, and attended to their repairs and outfits, while Savage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. President, Directors & Co. of Rensselaer Glass Factory v. ReidCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  2. Reid v. President of the Rensselaer Glass FactoryNew York Supreme Court · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API