Falco v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant appeals the denial of her rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction and/or mitigation of sentence. Despite the language in the order of dismissal informing appellant that she had thirty days to appeal, there is no right to appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion. See Reeves v. State, 23 So.3d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Howard v. State, 914 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Reeves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Mosquera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010