Legal Opinion

S. Birch & Sons Construction Co. v. Capehart

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 6, 1961No. Civ. A-10934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HODGE, District Judge.

This is an action in interpleader under the provisions of Section 1335, Title 28 U.S.C.A., brought by the plaintiffs to determine conflicting claims to monies remaining in its hands representing the balance due the defendant Ralph C. Cape-hart, d/b/a Anchorage Freight Lines, upon a service contract amounting to $6,075.40, which has been paid into the registry of the court.

The following claims have been filed by answer to the complaint, or, in the case of the United States, by petition in intervention:

W. A. Stephenson: Judgment entered May 20, 1960, in cause No. A-10,149…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Miller v. Bank of America, N. T. & S. A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. United States v. Jewel HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Narragansett Bay Gardens, Inc. v. Grant Construction Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sun Bank, N. A. v. Snell (In Re Cone)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API