Legal Opinion

Christodoulou v. Terdeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for assault and battery, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated January 23, 2001, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, to review objections raised at an examination before trial of the plaintiff.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The provision of the order appealed from is not appealable as a matter of right and leave to appeal has not been granted (see, Bassi v Carbonell, 276 AD2d 574; Sainz v New York City Health & Hosp.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sainz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Bassi v. CarbonellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API