Legal Opinion

Lozano v. Acevedo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1983No. 04-81-00247-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, Justice.

This is an appeal from the issuance of a writ of mandamus by the County Court at Law, ordering a municipal judge not to require a personal appearance of the principal as a condition precedent to approving an appeal bond to a county court at law. We affirm in part and reverse and render in part.

The controversy arose when the Honorable Robert Lozano issued a directive to all municipal court judges of the City of San Antonio requiring a defendant to be present in court when a plea of guilty or nolo contendere was entered for the purpose of appealing the case to county…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winfrey v. ChandlerTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. City of Beaumont v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Harden v. Colonial Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Duncan v. Dripping Springs Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Fry v. McDuffeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  2. Scott v. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API