Windham v. Windham

BROWN, Justice.

We agree with the contention of appellee’s counsel that the evidence does not support the conclusion that the appellee, Windham, brought about or procured the debauchery of his wife. It at most shows a bungling effort on his part aided by his cousin, Jones, to fabricate testimony upon which he hoped to procure a divorce from her. It wholly fails to show that she committed adultery with Jones, as charged in the bill. Any other conclusion is incompatible with the fact that Jones remained in the employ of appellee in a responsible position up to the time appellee testified as a…