Legal Opinion
Chipman v. Chonin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 14, 1992No. 91-992PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
597 So.2d 363 (1992)
Nolan P. CHIPMAN, Appellant,
v.
Neil CHONIN, et al., Appellees.
No. 91-992.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 14, 1992.
Nolan P. Chipman, in pro. per.
Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell & Wechsler, P.A., F. Laurens Brock and Jodi R. Young, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
2Per curiam
Nolan Chipman appeals from a final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants in a legal malpractice/breach of contract case. We affirm.
A party cannot recover damages for legal malpractice unless it is shown that the lawyer neglected a reasonable duty which was…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Tuttle/White Constructors v. MONTGOMERY, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Davenport v. StoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Vukovich v. LeoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
4Cited by16 opinions
- Border Collie Rescue, Inc. v. RyanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- Sure-Snap Corp. v. BaenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Cibran Enterprises, Inc. v. BP Products North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Dadic v. SchneiderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Young v. Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.