Legal Opinion

Whyte's Estate

Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County

Decided March 21, 1930Published

1Opinion of the Court

Van Dusen, J.,

— We agree with the conclusion of the Auditing Judge that the trust fund created by the decedent for his son was not an advancement. “ ‘All questions of advancement,’ ” it was said by Sergeant, J., in Daniel King’s Estate, 6 Whart. 370, “ ‘must depend on the intention of the parent in making the gift. If there be no evidence at all on the subject, then whether it was an advancement or a present may be judged of by its amount and character:’ ” Story’s Appeal, 83 Pa. 89, 98.

The terms of the trust and the circumstances under which it was made show that it was intended primarily for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Miller's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  3. Storey's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. Lentz v. HertzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API