Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Metcalf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoes, J.

The issue presented is the sufficiency of a complaint in which plaintiff, defendant’s former wife, sues defendant to compel him to reimburse her for all Federal and State income taxes paid by her on sums she received under a post-nuptial property settlement agreement made between the parties while they were husband and wife.

In the first cause of action based on the written agreement made in 1934, plaintiff alleges defendant agreed to pay her $15,000 a year net after payment of all income taxes; and demands that defendant reimburse her for $46,599.65 Federal and State income taxes paid by her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Abrams v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Kraunz v. KraunzNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Pletman v. GoldsollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. 805 Third Ave. Co. v. M.W. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Sands v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Metcalf v. MetcalfNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. La Potin v. Julius Lang Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Lacks v. LacksNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API