State v. Million
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Larry P. Million appeals from his conviction and sentence for voyeurism, following a bench trial. He contends that his conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence.
We conclude that although the facts, as found by the trial court, would be sufficient to sustain a conviction for attempted voyeurism, they are insufficient to sustain Million’s voyeurism conviction. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed, and this cause will be remanded for a new trial.
I
Million and Wesley Newman, an eight-year-old boy, were seated in stalls in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. TannerOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Roszmann v. Lions DenOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. HenryOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. HardgroveOhio Court of Appeals · 2022