Legal Opinion
Sunol School District v. Chipman
California Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1903No. S.F. No. 3253PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion. James H. Campbell, District Attorney; William A. Beasly, and R. R. Syer, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
The case is here on an agreed statement of facts, defendant appealing from the judgment, which directed defendant to apportion to the Sunol School District “its pro rata share of state and county school moneys, to be apportioned upon the average daily attendance of the pupils in the public schools of said county for the year ending June 30, 1901, based upon the average daily attendance in said school district of 239 pupils,” and enjoining defendant from apportioning said pro rata share of said moneys to any other school district or districts. It appears from the agreed statement of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Morgan Cty. Bd. of Ed. v. Ala. Public SchoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Oro Madre Unified School District v. Amador County Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Rice v. McClellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927