Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Sweeney

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 9, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is a proceeding under the statute seeking an annulment of the marriage of the parties on the ground that the petitioner’s consent thereto was obtained by the fraud of the petitionee. At'the close of the petitioner’s evidence, the petitionee moved for judgment on the ground that it unquestionably appeared that before the petition was brought, the-parties had voluntarily cohabited as man and wife. This motion was overruled and the petitionee excepted. The court thereupon found the facts and rendered judgment for the petitioner. The petitionee excepted to the judgment.

The only question here…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. DeLoy v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Barnes v. WyetheSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  4. Munger v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  5. Whalen v. Peerless Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reaves v. Sunset Branch, National Bank of South Dakota (In Re Reaves)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1981
  2. Zutavern v. ZutavernNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. DeMedio v. DeMEDIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Sampson v. SampsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API