Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Peerless Casualty Company, Surety for Delores Nelson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 15, 1964No. 18217Published

1Concurrence

WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.

I concur in the court’s opinion. I would add only that although Rule 46 does use the word “forfeiture” in characterizing a bail bond recovery proceeding, such a proceeding has long been recognized not to be a suit upon a “penalty” but upon a “promise to pay a penalty.” See, e. g., United States v. Luther, 13 F.Supp. 126 (E.D.N.Y.1935), and cases cited; cf. United States v. Springer & Lotz, 69 F.2d 819 (2d Cir. 1934); Dudley v. United States, 242 F.2d 656, 658 (5th Cir. 1957). And see also Meeker v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co., cited by the court in footnote 5.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adrian Lawrence Dudley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. Springer & LotzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. LutherDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935