Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Andrew P. Leazer

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 19, 1972No. 24799Published

1ConcurrenceBazelon, Chief Judge

(concurring) :

I am a great deal more troubled than my colleagues by the trial court’s questioning of the witnesses who testified on the insanity defense. In what may well have been a good faith effort to elicit the factual underpinning of the witnesses’ conclusions, the trial court repeatedly interrupted defense counsel’s questioning of the witnesses, and assumed a considerable measure of the responsibility for their examination. In the course of his questioning, the trial judge made a number of pointed comments and observations which could have been taken by the jury to reflect some…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Thomas H. Washington, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Francina King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Roosevelt Rollerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. Holloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API