United States v. Andrew P. Leazer
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1ConcurrenceBazelon, Chief Judge
(concurring) :
I am a great deal more troubled than my colleagues by the trial court’s questioning of the witnesses who testified on the insanity defense. In what may well have been a good faith effort to elicit the factual underpinning of the witnesses’ conclusions, the trial court repeatedly interrupted defense counsel’s questioning of the witnesses, and assumed a considerable measure of the responsibility for their examination. In the course of his questioning, the trial judge made a number of pointed comments and observations which could have been taken by the jury to reflect some…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Thomas H. Washington, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Francina King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Roosevelt Rollerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Holloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.