Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. MacFarlane (In re MacFarlane)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Senior Circuit Judge:
We address in these appeals which party has the ultimate burden of proof in bankruptcy proceedings when a state files a claim for taxes alleging that a debtor’s bad debt deductions are invalid. Both the bankruptcy and district courts held that the state bears the burden of proving its claim. The bankruptcy court determined that the state failed to meet its burden and entered judgment in favor of the debtor; the district court reversed, ruling that inferences drawn from the evidence create triable issues of fact. We affirm the allocation of the burden of proof; we…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Michael L. Rockwell, and Regina Rockwell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor. Alan WRIGHT, Creditor-Appellee, v. Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Sambo's Restaurants, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtor. Sambo's Restaurants, Inc., a California Corporation v. Peggy WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In The Matter Of Fidelity Holding Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Sherry Gasaway v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, an Oregon Corporation John Does 1-10 Doe Partnerships 1-10 Roe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re HattonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Foothill Capital Corp. v. Clare's Food Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Compton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001