Legal Opinion

Brunhild v. . Freeman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Civil ActioN tried at June Special Term, 1-878, -of New HaNover -Superior Court, before Eure, J. The facts a-re fully stated in same case reported in 77 N. ■O., 128, and 78 N. C., 67, and those material to the point discussed and determined upon this appeal, are embodied in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Dillard. Judgment for defendants, appeal by plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtDillard, J.

'The defendants executed to the plaintiffs ■four notes of $ 100 each and delivered them together, and on the same consideration, falling due at three, six, nine, and twelve months respectively. On the maturity of the first one, the -same was put in suit and prosecuted to judgment, and when the other three notes became due, actions were severally brought on them in a justice^ court, which were defended on the ground that they were never delivered and were obtained by fraud, and for an alleged failure or want of consideration; and from judgments rendered thereon, the defendants appealed to the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Springs v. SchenckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Springs v. . SchenckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API