Grigsby v. CMI Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
The remaining defendants, CMI Corporation (“CMI”), CMI Financial Services, Inc. (“CMIFS”), and Edward Cherney, have moved for summary judgment or to dismiss. The Torchmark defendants have heretofore been dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction.
When defendants’ motion first came before the Court, it was denied without prejudice, the parties being advised that the Court would at a later time reconsider its ruling. Notice of the Court’s intention was given to the parties on December 13, 1983, when the Court sent counsel a proposed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,548 Radiation Dynamics, Inc. v. Lawrence GoldmuntzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,222 William M. McCormick v. The Fund American Companies, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Grigsby v. CMI Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Kress AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.