Legal Opinion
Jennings v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 1, 1964No. Appeal, 122PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen,
Appellees, Dan R. Jennings, a Pittsburgh real estate broker, and his associate, Daniel B. Cantor, a New York real estate investment counselor and attorney, instituted this action of assumpsit against Pittsburgh Mercantile Company (Mercantile) to recover a real estate brokerage commission for the alleged consummation of a sale and leaseback of all of Mercantile’s real property. Mercantile appeals from the lower court’s denial of its motion for judgment n.o.v. after jury verdict for appellees.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. Wick Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- Gabriel v. Auf Der Heide-Aragona, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Simon v. H. K. Porter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- General Electric Co. v. N. K. Ovalle, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Colonial Trust Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Revere Press, Inc. v. BLUMBERGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Turnway Corporation v. SofferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- William B. Tanner Co., Inc., and Pepper & Tanner, Inc. v. Wioo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- D & G Equipment Co., Inc. v. The First National Bank of Greencastle, Pa. v. Georgion, Roger L., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Volunteer Fire Co. v. Hilltop Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.