Legal Opinion
Cano v. Mallory Management
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph J. Maltese, J.
The defendant, Con Edison, moved to dismiss the plaintiffs negligence action based on the fact that he is an illegal immigrant. This court has denied that application.
On March 27, 2002 the United States Supreme Court held in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v National Labor Relations Bd. (535 US 137 [2002]) that workers who were illegal immigrants could not sue in the federal courts for lost wages after the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that they were *667wrongfully terminated, due to a federal statute. The defendant, Con Edison (Con Ed), seeks to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mendoza v. Zirkle Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Zeng Liu v. Donna Karan International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- MATTER OF ALIESSA v. NovelloNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Singh v. Jutla & C.D. & R's Oil, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Veliz v. Rental Service Corp. USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Crespo v. Evergo Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- David v. Signal International, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.