Legal Opinion
United States v. Victor Wexler, Honorable John W. Bissell, Nominal
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 12, 1994No. 18-2417PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LOUIS H. POLLAK, Senior District Judge.
Before us is a petition from the United States for a writ of mandamus or prohibition directed to the Honorable John W. Bissell, United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey. The government’s petition arises out of a pretrial order entered in a criminal tax fraud case against Victor Wexler which is to be tried before Judge Bissell. The order adopted a jury instruction on “genuine indebtedness” that, in the government’s view, undermines a well-settled prohibition against deducting interest payments resulting from “sham…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Acm Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner, in No. 97-7484 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Acm Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in No. 97-7527Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In Re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Winn-Dixie Stores v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1999
- United States v. Jorge L. Pabon-CruzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- In Re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.