Legal Opinion

Arvida Corp. v. Nu-Way Plumbing, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 1974No. 74-44Published

1Per curiam

We reverse the trial court order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The action was for recision of a contract because of mistake. As plaintiff-appellee concedes, the complaint was defective for failure to allege the mistake with particularity. F.R.C.P. 1.120(b), 30 F.S. A.; Curtis v. Briscoe, 129 So.2d 450 (2d D.C.A. Fla.1961) and Van Meter v. Bank of Clearwater, 276 So.2d 241 (2d D.C.A. Fla. 1973).

However, plaintiff urges that the complaint can be sustained upon some theory of a breach of oral contract. It may or may not have such cause of action. However, even under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Curtis v. BriscoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. Van Meter v. Bank of ClearwaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API