Legal Opinion
Huffer v. Herman
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 9, 2001No. C2-00-897PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Roy and Robert Huffer seek declaratory and injunctive relief stemming from Defendants’ imposition of a civil penalty on Plaintiffs for breach of fiduciary duty as co-trustees of a pension plan and profit sharing plan. Pursuant to the Administrative ■ Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, Plaintiffs seek judicial review of Defendants’ decision to impose the civil penalty and denial of their petition to waive or reduce the penalty. This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Record at 7) and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rulli v. Fan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chao v. Hall Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Chao v. Hall Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Libertarian Party v. HustedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Randal Williams v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026
- The Trustees of the New York State Nurses Association Pension Plan v. White Oak Global Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022