Legal Opinion

Thermal Systems of Alabama v. Sigafoose

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 16, 1988No. 86-852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves the validity of agreements made by the owner of a patent for a heat exchanger with individuals who agreed to distribute and sell the product.

The plaintiffs (Thermal Systems of Alabama, Team Energy Management Consults, and W. Frank Todd) based their action upon theories of breach of contract, interference with business or contractual relations, and unfair competition. The trial judge held that the contracts upon which plaintiffs sued were unenforceable because of uncertainty or lack of mutuality of obligation. Based solely upon this holding, the trial judge granted summary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. SchimpfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Cosby-Hodges Milling Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, Pennzoil Products Company, a Division of Pennzoil Company, Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. MDC Corp., Inc. v. John H. Harland Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Jo-Ann, Inc. v. Alfin Fragrances, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  4. Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
  5. Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, Pennzoil Products Company, a Division of Pennzoil Company, Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API