Thermal Systems of Alabama v. Sigafoose
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal involves the validity of agreements made by the owner of a patent for a heat exchanger with individuals who agreed to distribute and sell the product.
The plaintiffs (Thermal Systems of Alabama, Team Energy Management Consults, and W. Frank Todd) based their action upon theories of breach of contract, interference with business or contractual relations, and unfair competition. The trial judge held that the contracts upon which plaintiffs sued were unenforceable because of uncertainty or lack of mutuality of obligation. Based solely upon this holding, the trial judge granted summary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pulliam v. SchimpfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Cosby-Hodges Milling Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, Pennzoil Products Company, a Division of Pennzoil Company, Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- MDC Corp., Inc. v. John H. Harland Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Jo-Ann, Inc. v. Alfin Fragrances, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1998
- Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, Pennzoil Products Company, a Division of Pennzoil Company, Intercorp, Inc. v. Pennzoil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989