Legal Opinion

Miller v. Beck

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Ejectment.. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, are stated in the opinion. Error to Ingham. (Gridley, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of a strip of land in the city of Lansing, a few inches wide, upon which rests the outer and rear wall of a brick store owned by the defendant Rebecca Beck.

Samuel Beck purchased in 1869 a parcel of land off the north end of lot six, block 100, in the city of Lansing, 20 feet north and south by 66 feet east and west. This is now the property of Rebecca,1 his widow. When Samuel bought the land there was a wooden building upon it, which was burned in August, 1870 or 1871. The year it was burned, Samuel Beck erected a three-story brick…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. Jackson ex dem. GenetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  2. Nelson v. BrodhackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Inhabitants of Nantucket v. CottonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  4. State Treasurer v. BishopSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Van BloklandOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Oldig v. FiskNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API