Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Borough of Middlesex

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 5, 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

268 N.J. Super. 177 (1993)

632 A.2d 1276

PETER GORDON AND THOMAS J. CAMMARATA, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 14, 1993.

Decided November 5, 1993.

Before Judges SHEBELL, LONG and LANDAU.

Paul Johnson argued the cause for appellant (Edward J. Johnson, Jr., attorney, on the brief).

Thomas J. Cammarata argued the cause for respondents (Shaljian, Cammarata & O'Connor, attorneys; Mary K. Costello on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

Defendant, Borough of Middlesex,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Valerius v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Moya v. City of New BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Bruno v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Sparkman v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oches v. Township of Middletown Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Monek v. Borough of South RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  3. McCurrie v. Town of KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Aperuta v. PirrelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. Aperuta v. PirrelloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API