Legal Opinion

Child Development Services—Cumberland County v. Attorney General

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 20, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.

[¶ 1] The plaintiffs, sixteen regional sites of the Child Development Services System (CDS), appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the motion for summary judgment of the Attorney General. We affirm the judgment. The Attorney General is authorized, pursuant to 5 M.R.S.A. § 191 (1989 & Pamph.1999), to control the provision of legal services to the regional CDS sites.

[¶ 2] The Legislature created CDS to “maintain[j a coordinated service delivery system,” 20-A M.R.S.A. § 7724(1) (Supp.1999), for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Builders Ass'n of Maine, Inc. v. Town of EliotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Department of Transportation v. Maine State Employees Ass'n, SEIU Local 1989Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Hutchinson v. Cary PlantationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeCotiis v. WhittemoreDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API