Legal Opinion

Bohlman v. Lorenzen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated December 26, 1992, which, inter alia, denied their renewed motion to vacate the dismissal of this action and to restore it to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A party seeking to restore a matter to the trial calendar after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 must show, inter alia, a reasonable excuse for any delay and an intent not to abandon the matter (see, Kopilas v Peterson, 206 AD2d 460; Civello v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Civello v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Kopilas v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Tucker v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Candeloro v. CandeloroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jeffs v. Janessa, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. McCarthy v. BagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Cruz v. Volkswagen of America Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. McKenna v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Tate v. Peninsula Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API