Legal Opinion

State v. E.M.R.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 2013No. DA 11-0627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 After a four-day trial in August 2011, a Lewis and Clark County jury found that E.M.R., a youth under the age of eighteen, had committed five misdemeanor offenses of “dog at large,” in violation of County Ordinance # 4-2006-13, and one felony offense of aggravated animal cruelty, in violation of § 45-8-217(2), MCA. E.M.R. appeals from the dispositional order entered by the First Judicial District Youth Court. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the Youth Court abuse its discretion when it instructed a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. State v. BrodniakMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. CybulskiMontana Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BettermanMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. OttoMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. E.M.R.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. BettermanMontana Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API