Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Mistler
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 27, 2006No. 154 MAP 2005, 155 MAP 2005, 156 MAP 2005, 157 MAP 2005, 158 MAP 2005, 158 MAP 2005, 159 MAP 2005, 160 MAP 2005, 161 MAP 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
912 A.2d 1265 (2006)
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Douglas MISTLER, Appellee,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Joanna Oliver, Appellee.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Patrick Luddy, Appellee,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Stacey Gillespie, Appellee,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Kali Warren, Appellee,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Paul Mudd, Appellee,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Hillary Kozak, Appellee,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Elise Sterbinsky, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued April 5,…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Castille; Dissent · Eakin.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.