Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 5, 1995No. 14406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

After a review of the record and briefs, and after hearing from the parties at oral argument, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has been denied a state or federal constitutional right and, further, has failed to sustain his burden of persuasion that the denial of certification to appeal was a clear abuse of discretion or that an injustice has been done. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 612, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); Simms v. Warden, 229 Conn. 178, 189, 640 A.2d 601 (1994); Walker v. Commissioner of Correction, 38 Conn. App. 99, 659 A.2d 195, cert.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Safford v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Walker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PhiddConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Williams v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Ortiz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Williamson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API