Williamson v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
After a review of the record and briefs, and after hearing from the parties at oral argument, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has been denied a state or federal constitutional right and, further, has failed to sustain his burden of persuasion that the denial of certification to appeal was a clear abuse of discretion or that an injustice has been done. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 612, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); Simms v. Warden, 229 Conn. 178, 189, 640 A.2d 601 (1994); Walker v. Commissioner of Correction, 38 Conn. App. 99, 659 A.2d 195, cert.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Safford v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Walker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PhiddConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Williams v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Ortiz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Williamson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996