Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1979No. 77-6970, CA 10902PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant was convicted of first degree robbery and first degree rape. He received an additional 10-year sentence on the rape conviction pursuant to ORS 166.230, which provides for such an enhanced penalty for felonies committed while armed, and pursuant to the jury’s special finding that "the defendant was in possession of a revolver” during the rape. The court had instructed the jury it could so find if defendant "physically possessed * * * a firearm, or if he had knowledge that an accomplice possessed the firearm.” Defendant contends ORS 166.230 should not be interpreted to permit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. BlackerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. BoothOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  4. State v. MazurkiewiczMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. ThiehoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API