Legal Opinion

Raffensberger v. Moran

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1984No. 2716PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action for libel, the trial court concluded from the pleadings, from pre-trial discovery, and from admissions and affidavits filed by the parties that the statements made by Joseph Moran and alleged to be defamatory of appellants, although capable of a defamatory meaning, were made without malice during a labor dispute. The court, therefore, granted summary judgment dismissing the action. We agree that the remarks were made during a labor dispute and were capable of a defamatory meaning. Because we conclude that the existence of malice was more properly a jury issue,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Keenheel v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Securities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Manno v. American General Finance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Holewinski v. CHILDREN'S HOSP. OF PITTS.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Melmed v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API