Raffensberger v. Moran
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this action for libel, the trial court concluded from the pleadings, from pre-trial discovery, and from admissions and affidavits filed by the parties that the statements made by Joseph Moran and alleged to be defamatory of appellants, although capable of a defamatory meaning, were made without malice during a labor dispute. The court, therefore, granted summary judgment dismissing the action. We agree that the remarks were made during a labor dispute and were capable of a defamatory meaning. Because we conclude that the existence of malice was more properly a jury issue,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Keenheel v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Securities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Manno v. American General Finance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Holewinski v. CHILDREN'S HOSP. OF PITTS.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Melmed v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.