Legal Opinion
La Vasque v. Beeson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 28, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
This is an action by the appellees against the appellants to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. This is the second appeal in the case. Beeson v. LaVasque, 144 Ark. 522.
The appellee, V. A. Beeson, alleged that he was the owner of a newspaper plant known as the “Morrilton Headlight,” in the town of Morrilton, Conway County, Arkansas; that on June 30, 1917, he entered into a written contract with Arthur W. LaVasque by which he leased to LaVasque the newspaper plant; that LaVasque agreed to operate said plant for the period that Beeson was absent in the military service of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Matlock v. ReppySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- New York Life Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Remmel v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Webster v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baston v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Newsum Auto Tire Vulcanizing Co. v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Devaux Legrand Owens v. American Bankers InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967